Building Bridges Between Vision and Reality

We started NeuronAlog because someone needed to make sense of the gap between what software should do and what it actually does. That someone turned out to be us.

How We Became the Testing People

Back in 2019, our founder Kieran Thorne was debugging yet another software rollout that had gone sideways. Users were frustrated, developers were defensive, and everyone was pointing fingers. That's when it hit him—the problem wasn't technical incompetence or user ignorance.

The problem was that nobody was speaking the same language.

"Testing isn't about finding bugs. It's about translating between two worlds that desperately need to understand each other."

So we built NeuronAlog around this simple idea: what if someone actually took the time to coordinate proper user acceptance testing? Not just run through test scripts, but really understand what users need and help development teams deliver it.

Six years later, we're still doing exactly that—just with better coffee and more experience under our belts.

Team collaboration and software testing coordination workspace

The People Behind the Process

Our team brings together quality assurance expertise, user experience insights, and enough patience to actually listen to what users are trying to tell us.

Kieran Thorne

Lead Testing Coordinator

What We Bring to Your Project

User Story Translation

We turn "it should work better" into specific, testable requirements that developers can actually implement.
Cross-Team Communication

Years of mediating between frustrated users and defensive developers have taught us how to keep conversations productive.
Taiwan Market Understanding

We understand local user behavior patterns and business practices that can make or break software adoption.
Practical Test Design

Our test scenarios reflect real-world usage, not theoretical edge cases that nobody will ever encounter.

What Drives Our Work

These aren't corporate values printed on a poster. They're the principles that emerged from years of actually doing this work and learning what matters.

Users Know What They Need

Even when they can't articulate it perfectly, users have real problems they're trying to solve. Our job is to help translate those needs into something development teams can work with.

Developers Want to Build Good Things

Most developers genuinely want their software to be useful. When they resist feedback, it's usually because the feedback isn't specific enough to act on.

Testing Is a Conversation

The best insights come from ongoing dialogue between users and builders, not from formal test reports that nobody reads.

Simple Solutions Usually Work

Complex testing frameworks and elaborate processes often create more problems than they solve. Clear communication and focused attention get better results.

How We Actually Work

Our methodology evolved from trial and error, not from textbooks. It focuses on getting useful feedback quickly and keeping communication flowing.

Listen First

Before we write a single test case, we spend time understanding what users actually do with the software and where their current pain points are.

Design Realistic Scenarios

Our test cases reflect real workflows, not idealized user journeys. We test what people will actually do, including the shortcuts and workarounds.

Coordinate Feedback Loops

We make sure insights from testing actually reach the people who can act on them, in language they can understand and implement.

Keep It Moving

Testing shouldn't slow down development. We focus on giving teams the information they need to keep moving forward confidently.

User testing coordination and feedback collection process

User Feedback Collection

Team Collaboration

Quality assurance testing and validation procedures

Quality Validation